Designing the End of Antisemitism: From Myth-Machines to Roomcraft
- Gavriel Wayenberg
- Nov 2
- 2 min read
At ISPCR we study how ideas ripple through systems. The End of Antisemitism is our first public field manual that treats antisemitism as a system to be redesigned—not a debate to be won. Here’s the research logic and the invitation.

Antisemitism behaves like a myth-machine: it reuses the same tropes (the tired flip from “singularity” to “superiority”), optimized by platforms that reward speed, heat, and spectacle. The usual response—more facts, louder—stalls because the conditions of talk are wrong. ISPCR’s contribution is to change those conditions.
My new book, The End of Antisemitism: A Field Manual for Accuracy, Courage & Hospitality (Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FYNB643F), consolidates that design approach. It operationalizes our research line BSPG (Body—Soul—Psyche—Geist as of BlackSwan PreCog):
Body — the scene: time, place, seating, pace.
Soul — shared sacreds: dignity, honesty, courage.
Psyche — shame-safe rules: no ambushes; reset lines.
Geist — meme hygiene: bring a third object (Myth-vs-Text card; exact excerpt).
When we ritualize accuracy with a four-line Covenant of Accuracy (quote the line; distinguish duty vs. rank; name the universal horizon), heated rooms cool fast enough to think clearly.
From there we graft in due-process guardrails (content vs. conduct), an education stack (12 modules, K-12 & adult), and a digital architecture (counterspeech, friction, trust signals, creator-ally networks). Finally, we measure: media tone, incident curves, civic trust, and education uptake.
This is not utopian rhetoric. It is roomcraft + lawcraft + culturecraft with dashboards.
The book’s theological backbone is simple and auditable: read the core verses out loud—Gen 12:2–3; Gen 15:5; Num 23:9; Isa 56:7—and the “superiority” slur collapses into what it always was: a misread. Distinctiveness = responsibility aimed at a universal horizon.
What ISPCR is doing next
Publishing starter kits (cards, worksheets, policy templates) as online annexes referenced in the book.
Running proposed 100-day pilots with schools, cities, and newsrooms to validate the stack and publish open metrics.
Convening a small network of researchers to analyze réminiscence (context discipline) and incident deltas.
If your institution wants to participate in the next cohort, reach out via ispcr.org. The hypothesis is bold and testable: cultures change when better habits become easier than outrage.
CTA: Read the book → https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FYNB643F • Partner with ISPCR → ispcr.org
Tags/SEO: #antisemitism, #cybernetics, #civicdesign, #education, #dueprocess, #medialiteracy, #ISPCR, #BSPG



Comments